本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯 1 \' V% c+ m2 I
) W1 n2 ~( F* C+ ^% z2 Q( K3 a不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來） $ e# `0 l8 J# o, u' h' e( ^
* Z2 \. y. d5 k) }; w3 b7 D* Y2 d3 C8 o
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說
, M! d9 f8 O8 y2 U4 V' w/ d
% u5 |6 Q" e0 H! M" ZJust trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
' q3 O: k% p" |5 }/ Q他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：
/ U( r% R3 |( @1 q
# k9 m" ]) @3 {* _+ fIf you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
6 l9 C2 `' }8 b r3 ^* _# D& P9 W- u& k+ m! C5 e3 P. {# Y) w6 h; n4 e- b
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.
( |5 {4 e$ D/ s; I! V6 |
- i4 ?0 t+ X5 oSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.3 p6 x: B, j2 v% Y' {* f
& Y& g+ N( W$ N1 u8 Y8 X, O' h
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
1 M- b$ ]; V, G) G" k0 E/ a( ?( ]順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
4 `9 o3 `+ c, S+ J1 A# d7 I0 S4 o! ~
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
1 y" x& B3 ~5 H2 w1 n+ }5 e! K8 W( D. L6 d2 W) X# |
: y @2 ^% a1 z" j$ \- Y
- x4 I; }* b7 S
8 i/ C8 A2 \+ F5 n+ q+ }
3 R( }8 `: |% U0 Q2 f v7 u5 ? |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
