本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
9 G) ]& d2 e- E) s4 r
e x5 Q& U" T- i, i" w8 T! J不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來） : q7 W1 w5 U3 j/ L7 o# {
# ], m- b! S( Y/ V對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說' D6 _4 k: R: U3 }" I
, ]* r' _( W2 p1 A
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：
: _; \/ a- [: a% `5 H! O; g' f, {* g( q, a, b
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
8 g A) N& m1 P+ F0 z7 K6 S7 l4 s* G7 X) M4 J# [
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.3 S9 F$ S8 F6 W& w4 o
+ A2 o" k. j' u' Y }$ k, F4 o
Suffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
% y7 R; a# _8 @! }; B# F: A4 k# k" R& ~8 L* z
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。: ?6 W) k2 v8 S, {9 x+ V; E, c
s. s7 B& f& j
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。0 a4 M# T' v! o% j& G7 z) W6 h3 C+ ~5 P
& M. ^, D- w8 Y1 }2 N$ N* k0 t* ~2 y4 Y: Z: ~* A9 M
* ~0 O4 {, a Q4 W
c( P/ ~/ `8 r" F
& I5 a$ Y1 @" G, [4 t' f |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
