本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯 2 y/ q& i3 _1 b; }# t, u
4 Z0 u; p. {5 a7 c
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
2 t$ @! t" g8 J9 X+ `3 r5 W* `
$ ?: d. P( j6 o+ m) K3 P1 C對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說. K& t; w3 L5 J* V& q1 ?0 y+ @5 v
; f9 I. [2 L* s. M: X- OJust trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：7 Z, X6 c) b. v. p" N7 H9 n7 z2 p: |
/ e* R5 r+ h" m( x$ s- KIf you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
+ C" h4 M/ b) `) z% K5 P: @1 Y; c% f2 I1 G5 I; _* ]2 u) T1 f' q
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.: I W/ Z% l; K: x9 M/ I8 ^* [
( E6 ]; l$ Z: s; R; U0 T4 @
Suffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
6 V- ?# I$ v2 C6 A# P
! ]; L4 N2 f. o8 oMost of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。) n" Q8 i9 A. G/ |) r% x7 u
+ H3 H/ W& A% q" w
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。6 J, F) Z Y2 I+ x y" F% V# Z
4 t ~+ G7 J- V
/ z( d3 w8 d. M) {. h7 y9 _3 n. C/ M; Y5 p' S2 |
; N! h. i% M1 t# g) b* o, j5 k# b( _/ ?/ C8 \1 Q
|
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
