本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
/ Z; K; d3 g& A- d1 G# B$ o3 W& ]" k8 m2 B+ f0 w
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
8 @+ X) g' m6 E* l- a" d0 a. ~3 Z" r0 l1 r5 l
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說; d- ^: g+ b# C/ j. a: a; H7 ~5 o
3 C" R* E- l7 C3 DJust trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：
& j) L2 {0 u2 I. r/ k- d1 P8 y. i" T
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking. l" M$ h) a/ b8 ?- N. h
$ o" B+ z# g& R, |" d1 Z6 @; Y
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content." X8 Z, @2 m5 [" P0 `
. x( k, X% k+ m, [ ?( @6 hSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
. x) q" s5 l' b4 ~8 J: f
( v f* c# Q9 m! RMost of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
% j9 E' ]. @$ l* V, y# ?順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。! I% A0 R+ i4 a0 L- L% ~
2 u! B" \6 k! l9 p4 i& c因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。% L& j) a' G! ]2 B. \
. d6 ?( Z& z+ f3 ~
( X' _/ w B( D1 z
+ \- l* ^$ c! W2 D \
. {' P; y+ p/ R% r$ j7 j" v
( h- P" K9 ^+ {/ g: C! q |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
