本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯
0 _4 T3 R9 e5 b+ i% l
8 c G" Q$ B% v$ g不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
7 v. C! R, [ U/ t) O
+ b6 D, {) h( l! Q1 _* w對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說
2 A, d) X( ]* B3 h Y; C2 P+ z- r
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
' N2 z: a$ Y. |9 R1 e$ }, H. t) R他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：
: Y) I+ K. T3 N! V# v' L
Z. ~7 s! {+ FIf you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking., Q2 l+ b. x5 O& x3 s
y0 b( ~4 O* _, Y1 u1 d3 zRather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.
; X; ^1 j5 \, ^3 W& v! l
6 @% |( `: n4 |% L; VSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
! q7 N) S9 O6 o* K5 Y9 c0 r6 |: |' D" H) e& H/ b, L3 P
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
$ @ y( q8 E1 z) K& u% v順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
6 p7 t4 c# K+ \, E! f, } n! v4 s4 u- }: ^' ?! g) p
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。
' [5 U) i0 W/ m& E: q3 m) h! K3 Q4 h! f. g3 P# v7 @8 a
4 r% Z4 O: v: e9 D6 ]8 X) z
6 I/ b) e/ i& k2 J
' x( ?0 K- q2 Q! ^$ S, V. ^& R$ d6 [. J" F) A. L" U
|
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
