本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯 2 q# ~1 V, `& u) w+ h& d# o) ~
0 O# m" ^, h% n4 r' V# b
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
$ j# A: V+ W; D. D; A) d* g" j* i! i' I( s
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說5 h- w2 R7 c+ ]( F
$ K' R8 L/ r' q- |8 Q |Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
# t. M8 n3 `( R1 G- S他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：$ F/ z2 k% X- y8 k/ U
; x% f p9 r* @" @If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.
% O" V2 j4 c# G! p9 k) @$ ]: b+ V, H! J. n$ q! n2 h& l4 `
Rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.% V, K7 c9 Z+ c6 z
# _' ^: e/ K- w
Suffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.7 P# V- ~0 `0 \. J
+ y! b- C. {, u2 J6 B
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
6 V/ ?/ H8 _$ l: H順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
0 q( E. m# A* ?1 X+ A/ {
/ d9 G3 o6 U4 p, u, v; ]6 e因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。: \8 J+ M5 V* s
. M1 j* [" m% b/ D- @7 K5 E w
1 [$ E# a+ O: M! ~. V" s; Y. Z) n
8 ^8 U7 N, `, B5 A$ C B1 N/ L( s4 b7 U& t; W" E |
; A3 U( t! o( b |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
