本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯 ( U$ t! ]7 \$ n8 _
$ p: ]9 ]: L$ b# Z; P8 z8 q
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
" g5 B- B7 ]3 }7 e3 Y' P3 R' v+ ?, n% p, L& Q6 Y8 b3 |# K$ h
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說, T% J0 ^2 D4 V7 t
) [# P- m5 u2 ~/ t% M5 RJust trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
: K f# _- _) S% l他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：
, G( K& x6 i5 ^+ A% O W, C7 Y* Q
9 O. d6 ]. {. K% E5 [) H) bIf you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking. {: r' |' z# f& ^5 p7 n8 I% O
" V, ^% h$ _8 F! `1 K5 kRather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.
# C2 h& v' h+ m, p- l
: l& m% |/ V% x. j: |# uSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results." X" ?, D- l0 T% q
( W7 ?9 x( d, C2 \
Most of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
8 a' R5 g7 p5 q5 D1 s7 O6 W順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。
- X; A& ]5 @. t1 f& X( a1 _2 c+ a. B6 D3 ^9 e
因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。' G# ^; U9 I& U
. [& u) r! k, s" k+ g1 M) U0 v& ~8 A* u3 T5 ^1 V- P3 J
, N: ~9 X( c7 c& S2 |
5 Y9 m8 j( _ j; k6 `
; Q' i8 x7 ?' O' M" { |
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
