本帖最後由 豬農 於 2013-10-20 10:10 編輯 & U' L% v# B5 r4 X* y& `! V6 ?
# y# e# a' N4 V0 Z, J7 P9 G
不知道這個話題有沒有已經討論過， Google+1 是否真的目前已經對排名有直接推高的影響，是值得研究一下。這個在樓主此帖 和 TGL 8月的另一貼都出現過了。（當然是國外翻譯來）
( j: ?4 p+ X. n' E9 J- v% O3 m/ R4 t, W, Q
對於 Google+1 目前是否已經對排名直接推高，Google的（發言人）Matt Cutts很快就出來跑到HackerNews上說，非也。他說; C4 }7 V% o3 a2 N
9 E0 z/ E; `# c8 Z1 r; K4 M
Just trying to decide the politest way to debunk the idea that more Google +1s lead to higher Google web rankings.
他繼續說這些不是谷歌信號：
7 H% w; K1 ]) `6 c& P- m) {- o& z5 w) w# k* q
If you make compelling content, people will link to it, like it, share it on Facebook, +1 it, etc. But that doesn't mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking.5 l0 P: }1 y' l' G1 S7 t' Q5 ]
# S$ ?& k. n5 aRather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.. I$ p" m8 n3 z, y( N$ p0 i
$ _! z" B5 D7 @- Z4 D& M$ lSuffice it to say that I would be very skeptical of anyone who claimed that more +1s led to a higher search ranking in Google's web results.
- a D5 j6 r! R; m( S& t Y
2 u! @1 v2 |5 g- c9 UMost of the initial discussion on this thread seemed to take from the blog post the idea that more Google +1s led to higher web ranking. I wanted to preemptively tackle that perception.
順便說一下，以前Facebook Shares也被認為有類似的效果，同樣被Cutts否定。但是後來有人提出，有+1 並非是壞事，因為，既然你的東西受歡迎，鏈多鏈高質鏈自然，排名靠前，讀者多，自然也會有更多 +1，facebook shares 等 （correlation），谷歌的算法看上去更自然。但目前，其+1數量多少並非「直接」推高排名（causation)。關鍵是」直接「二字, 間接的效果很可能有(indirectly promote links, tweets and other signals)，這裡就不詳述了。8 o3 y3 M; [$ C+ \% ]& ^9 q, X, i1 q
) M; d3 K" w1 H$ A' U0 H因此看來，對於+1 ，圖表所表示的僅僅是correlation，而非causation。% G( s7 N% G$ U2 r& k9 W
- E8 o. {$ O7 T+ Q* T3 O! ]
& V/ `/ r/ V% [' T- S+ F
2 b7 {! d, W% E3 u$ g
0 F# _9 L$ _4 C3 l) G4 ]9 L& B7 _8 T1 C$ G4 E9 Q
|
發表於 2013-10-19 15:18:37
